In 1942, America was at war. The bombing of Pearl Harbor marked U.S. entry into World War 2 and also exposed the still latent bigoted prejudices of a country. Americans of Japanese descent were politicized with the war and were subjected to discrimination and regulated to American concentration camps.
Japanese presence had been established with immigrants coming to America working the gold mines in the late 1800s. America in those days was not only prejudiced against African-Americans but also Asians and any other ethnicity considered to be 'non-white'. Japanese students were segregated in California schools and with the passing of the "Oriental Exclusion Law", were blocked from attaining American citizenship.
The Japanese were not violent or aggressive, combative or even anti-American. They were victims of fear-mongering propaganda during a time of war. In 1942, 100,000 Japanese were sent to "War Relocation Camps" on Executive Order 9066. Of the 100,000 forced into these camps, 70,000 were Japanese-American citizens.
How could this happen in 1940 America? How could Jim Crow and "colored only" segregation happen? And who was enforcing these unconstitutional practices? We could argue the complicity of state and government officials but certainly, the assent of fear and hate propaganda placed the common American in opposition to peaceful minority groups.
This proliferation of fear and hate has always been the pre-amble to the acceptance of the "radicalization" of our constitution and our American values.
It is important to note that Anti-Islamic propaganda did not begin with 9/11. I can recall, as a young boy, threatening phone calls made to our Mosque during the Iran hostage crisis in 1979. At that time, the "radicalization" of the Muslim image was exacerbated through the media and hollywood, as middle easterners were consistently cast as anti-American terrorist.
In Denzel Washington's movie, 'The Siege', a friendly American Muslim was cast as his partner and good friend. A movie set in New York following the first 1993 terrorist attack depicting New York City under siege by suicide bombers. As if taken directly from the archives of Japanese-American history, Muslims were 'relocated' into gated camps by the military out of fear that any Muslim could take allegiance with the enemy.
Today's Homeland Security Committee hearing chaired by Rep. Peter King seemed all too surreal and yet familiar. I watched the hearing as if I was the 'Muslim' in a documentary depicting how the "Islamic Exclusionary Act of 2012" began to take shape.
Japanese presence had been established with immigrants coming to America working the gold mines in the late 1800s. America in those days was not only prejudiced against African-Americans but also Asians and any other ethnicity considered to be 'non-white'. Japanese students were segregated in California schools and with the passing of the "Oriental Exclusion Law", were blocked from attaining American citizenship.
The Japanese were not violent or aggressive, combative or even anti-American. They were victims of fear-mongering propaganda during a time of war. In 1942, 100,000 Japanese were sent to "War Relocation Camps" on Executive Order 9066. Of the 100,000 forced into these camps, 70,000 were Japanese-American citizens.
How could this happen in 1940 America? How could Jim Crow and "colored only" segregation happen? And who was enforcing these unconstitutional practices? We could argue the complicity of state and government officials but certainly, the assent of fear and hate propaganda placed the common American in opposition to peaceful minority groups.
This proliferation of fear and hate has always been the pre-amble to the acceptance of the "radicalization" of our constitution and our American values.
It is important to note that Anti-Islamic propaganda did not begin with 9/11. I can recall, as a young boy, threatening phone calls made to our Mosque during the Iran hostage crisis in 1979. At that time, the "radicalization" of the Muslim image was exacerbated through the media and hollywood, as middle easterners were consistently cast as anti-American terrorist.
In Denzel Washington's movie, 'The Siege', a friendly American Muslim was cast as his partner and good friend. A movie set in New York following the first 1993 terrorist attack depicting New York City under siege by suicide bombers. As if taken directly from the archives of Japanese-American history, Muslims were 'relocated' into gated camps by the military out of fear that any Muslim could take allegiance with the enemy.
Today's Homeland Security Committee hearing chaired by Rep. Peter King seemed all too surreal and yet familiar. I watched the hearing as if I was the 'Muslim' in a documentary depicting how the "Islamic Exclusionary Act of 2012" began to take shape.
Rep. King's, supposedly innocent, preemptive hearing to examine the 'status' of the American Muslim mindset further moves the paradigm of imbalance and xenophobia closer to the danger zone. If there was some good to come out of the hearing, which I watched and did hear some stories of support, most of America will mostly draw concern as they only get media sound bites, a headline or two and the news ticker scrolling at the bottom of their TVs showing,
"A Congressional Hearing was held on the Extent of Radicalization of among American Muslims".
Once again, the words 'Radical' and 'Muslim' are made to be synonymous and the fear propaganda continues.
We as Americans must be very careful at this particular time. We cannot accentuate the extremist actions of a few over the peaceful lifestyles of the majority of Muslims. Terrorism should not be categorized or presented as a 'Muslim' issue. Terrorism itself is a perceptive concept. Edgar Hoover labeled Martin Luther King and most Black Civil Rights groups as threats to America and terrorist.
There is a long-standing American Muslim narrative of peaceful civility and the American Dream. The narrative being presented by Rep. King and most American media outlets is not only unfair to the six million American Muslims but is also beginning to challenge the American Muslim's civil and possibly human rights.
In 1988, President Ronald Reagan signed legislation which apologized for the internment of the Japanese on behalf of the U.S. government. The legislation said, "government actions were based on race prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership". The U.S. government not only admitted it's fault but disbursed more than $1.6 billion in reparations to Japanese Americans who had been held captive and their heirs. I should mention descendants of 300 years of slavery still have not received any reparations...but I digress.
America has long been the 'melting pot' of the world. Today's Americans are descendants from every corner of the earth. Our values as a country are God-centered which is ecumenical, cross-cultural, aracial and at the foundation of the Constitution. It doesn't matter our faith, the moral authority to recognize right vs. wrong is something we have always shared.
It is not Islam that is radical but the individual who becomes radical. Rep. Shelia Lee said it well, "you can't clean a dirty kitchen with dirty water". We have a constitution that upholds the rights and freedoms of every American...Muslim and non-Muslim. Terrorism is ugly and immoral but it's also indifferent of faith. Acts of terrorism are committed by and against individuals from all groups and from all faiths. Hearings such as these are not how we 'clean the kitchen'.
The KKK and Martin Luther King were both Christian. Yet, a hearing was not held on the "Radicalization" of American Christians. We don't demonize the silent Christian liberals and conservatives who remained quiet during the Civil Rights movement or during the detainment of Japanese-Americans. We also have not charged them with the responsibility to eradicate a radical minority.
I get confused with all the different terminologies being used to define Islam. Radical Islam, Islamism, Muslim Moderates, Islamic extremist, Muslim Extremist, etc. are all terms referencing Islam but none define what it is or what a Muslim is to be.
I don't really know what a 'moderate' Muslim is, as if there is a Muslim meter with moderates in the middle and extremist at the end. There's only one type of Muslim described in the Holy Quran, which is one who serves God and serves humanity. Muslims live by the universal moral code that all people of faith follow.
What should be addressed is the "politicalization" of Islam and how western imperialist politics have aided in creating this climate. Hmm...I wonder who would actually conduct that hearing? Anyway, radicalization of individuals doesn't happen in a vacuum, it's a process fueled by apathy and pain...not religion.
Just like in 1942, America today is at war with a people whose lifestyle and religious practices are virtually unknown to the American people. There were officials who falsely proselytized discrimination and hate against Japanese Americans. Today Rep. King, in the spirit of his bigoted forefathers commenced to committing the same crime.
After watching the hearing, I do believe the racist motives of the organizers were thwarted with honest testimonies and defenses of Muslim Americans by both Muslims and non-Muslims. I pray this is the spirit that goes forward....aw damn....just read the news ticker.
"A Congressional Hearing was held on the Extent of Radicalization of among American Muslims".
Once again, the words 'Radical' and 'Muslim' are made to be synonymous and the fear propaganda continues.
We as Americans must be very careful at this particular time. We cannot accentuate the extremist actions of a few over the peaceful lifestyles of the majority of Muslims. Terrorism should not be categorized or presented as a 'Muslim' issue. Terrorism itself is a perceptive concept. Edgar Hoover labeled Martin Luther King and most Black Civil Rights groups as threats to America and terrorist.
There is a long-standing American Muslim narrative of peaceful civility and the American Dream. The narrative being presented by Rep. King and most American media outlets is not only unfair to the six million American Muslims but is also beginning to challenge the American Muslim's civil and possibly human rights.
In 1988, President Ronald Reagan signed legislation which apologized for the internment of the Japanese on behalf of the U.S. government. The legislation said, "government actions were based on race prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership". The U.S. government not only admitted it's fault but disbursed more than $1.6 billion in reparations to Japanese Americans who had been held captive and their heirs. I should mention descendants of 300 years of slavery still have not received any reparations...but I digress.
America has long been the 'melting pot' of the world. Today's Americans are descendants from every corner of the earth. Our values as a country are God-centered which is ecumenical, cross-cultural, aracial and at the foundation of the Constitution. It doesn't matter our faith, the moral authority to recognize right vs. wrong is something we have always shared.
It is not Islam that is radical but the individual who becomes radical. Rep. Shelia Lee said it well, "you can't clean a dirty kitchen with dirty water". We have a constitution that upholds the rights and freedoms of every American...Muslim and non-Muslim. Terrorism is ugly and immoral but it's also indifferent of faith. Acts of terrorism are committed by and against individuals from all groups and from all faiths. Hearings such as these are not how we 'clean the kitchen'.
The KKK and Martin Luther King were both Christian. Yet, a hearing was not held on the "Radicalization" of American Christians. We don't demonize the silent Christian liberals and conservatives who remained quiet during the Civil Rights movement or during the detainment of Japanese-Americans. We also have not charged them with the responsibility to eradicate a radical minority.
I get confused with all the different terminologies being used to define Islam. Radical Islam, Islamism, Muslim Moderates, Islamic extremist, Muslim Extremist, etc. are all terms referencing Islam but none define what it is or what a Muslim is to be.
I don't really know what a 'moderate' Muslim is, as if there is a Muslim meter with moderates in the middle and extremist at the end. There's only one type of Muslim described in the Holy Quran, which is one who serves God and serves humanity. Muslims live by the universal moral code that all people of faith follow.
What should be addressed is the "politicalization" of Islam and how western imperialist politics have aided in creating this climate. Hmm...I wonder who would actually conduct that hearing? Anyway, radicalization of individuals doesn't happen in a vacuum, it's a process fueled by apathy and pain...not religion.
Just like in 1942, America today is at war with a people whose lifestyle and religious practices are virtually unknown to the American people. There were officials who falsely proselytized discrimination and hate against Japanese Americans. Today Rep. King, in the spirit of his bigoted forefathers commenced to committing the same crime.
After watching the hearing, I do believe the racist motives of the organizers were thwarted with honest testimonies and defenses of Muslim Americans by both Muslims and non-Muslims. I pray this is the spirit that goes forward....aw damn....just read the news ticker.
